← Dualist theories · The Arena · Your Companion · Intervention · Year 13 · Metaphysics of Mind

Revise & mock

Dualist theories. One lesson at a time: listen to the episode, play the three games until the streak holds, then write to a real past-paper question in the time the exam gives you.

♪ episode🎮 three games✍ past questions, timed🦉 Coach Owl on every answer🏟 The Arena — six games, three levels ↗
XP 0 · best streak 0
THE UNIT IN PAST PAPERS

Every question AQA has asked on dualist theories

Specimen to 2026, by tariff. A dash means that year's question at that tariff was on another unit of the same section.

Year3 marks5 marks5 marks12 marks25 marks
Specimen—Q02Outline Descartes' conceivability argument for substance dualism.———
2019———Q04Explain the philosophical zombies argument and the response that what is conceivable may not be metaphysically possible.—
2020——Q03Outline Descartes' indivisibility argument for substance dualism.Q04Outline epiphenomenalist dualism and explain the challenge posed by introspective self-knowledge.—
2021——Q03Explain how natural selection/evolution poses a challenge for epiphenomenalist dualism.—Q05Can a dualist account of mental states be successfully defended?
2022Q01What is a philosophical zombie?——Q04Explain the 'knowledge/Mary' argument (for property dualism) and the response that Mary gains acquaintance knowledge rather than propositional knowledge.—
2023———Q04Explain the 'problem of other minds' facing dualism and the response that the existence of other minds is the best hypothesis.—
2024—Q02Explain Descartes' conceivability argument for substance dualism.—Q04Explain interactionist dualism and the empirical interaction problem facing it.—
2025—Q02Explain one similarity and one difference between interactionist dualism and epiphenomenalist dualism.———
2026Q01What is interactionist dualism?————
BEFORE YOU HAND IT IN

What the examiner writes in the margin

Read your answer as the examiner will. Which of these would they write beside it?

Beside answers that score“argues with intent”“precise”“fully integrated and logical form”“sustained”“strongest forms of the arguments”“judgement reached and justified”“all parts covered, in order”
Beside answers that don't“fragmented points”“confusion between neighbouring terms”“juxtaposed, not integrated”“asserted, not argued”“description where evaluation was asked for”“runs out of time”