A-Level Religious Studies · AQA Paper 2B Harlington School · Philosophy & Ethics

The Nature of God

One unit, one question — asked seven ways. What do Christians mean when they call God one, omnipotent, triune, personal — and does every definition hold?

The
big
question

What is the nature of the Christian God — and how far can human language and doctrine capture it?

01

The nature-of-God spectrum

Every debate in this unit turns on a definition — of “one”, “omnipotent”, “person”, “Christian”. Pick a sub-topic, then tap a position to see what it claims and where it's strong or weak.

Ethical / relational onenessStrict numerical oneness

Tap a circle — or use Tab and Enter — to explore each position.

The thread that ties it together

Top answers don't treat the three debates separately. Two ideas run through all of them — spot the thread and you're writing at the top of the mark scheme.

It's the definition

Every sub-topic hangs on one word — one, omnipotent, person, Christian. Nail the definition and the essay follows.

Transcendent vs immanent

How far is God beyond us, how far with us? The tension runs through the Trinity, personal language and process theology alike.

Can language hold God?

From anthropomorphism to McFague to process thought — each asks whether human words can ever capture the divine.

02

The same question, seven ways

The unit splits into seven sub-topics. They look different, but each is really asking what is the nature of God, and can we capture it?

Sub-topic 1

Christian Monotheism

What does one God mean?
EthicalOne God = one moral authority (covenant).
PropheticIsaiah: only one God exists at all.
DevelopmentIsrael moved from many gods to one.
Shema“The Lord our God, the Lord is one.”
Sub-topic 2

Creator, Omnipotent, Benevolent

Can the attributes hold?
OmnipotentAll-powerful Creator ex nihilo.
BenevolentAll-loving — the inconsistent triad.
TheodicyAugustine / Hick keep all three.
ProcessDrop omnipotence to solve evil.
Sub-topic 3

The Importance of the Trinity

Is God one or three?
CoherenceHolds sin, atonement, redemption.
PersonalTranscendent AND immanent.
PersonhoodGod is love; a model for us.
OrthodoxOne substance, three persons.
Sub-topic 4

Jesus as the Son of God

Is Jesus God or man?
TrinitarianLiterally God the Son (John 10:30).
PurposeOne in will, not essence (hen).
LiberalAn exceptional, godly man.
Kurios1 Cor 8:6 — Lord, but ambiguous.
Sub-topic 5

Personal Language

Does human language fit?
PersonalGod answers prayer — Abba.
Father / KingStrength, authority, love.
ChallengeDoes it limit God (Freud)?
AnalogicalTrue of God, not literal.
Sub-topic 6

Feminist Critique

Is God-talk too male?
CritiqueMale/monarchical — harms women & nature.
McFagueMother, Lover, Friend.
PanentheismThe world as ‘the body of God’.
Re-writeSupplement, don’t abandon.
Sub-topic 7

Process Theology

Is this still Christian?
Not ex nihiloGod orders eternal chaos (Griffin).
Not omnipotentGod persuades, not coerces.
StrengthSolves the problem of evil.
WeaknessA non-omnipotent God worth worship?
03

Your resources

🎯 Practice and intervention for this unit · the Arena warm-up, the same question answered at D, C, B and A*, the four moves of your tier, timed writing with Coach Owl

Everything for the unit, in one place. Open a sub-topic's lesson, booklet and podcast, and use the Philosopher Companion across all three.

Teacher setup: links aren't set yet. Open this file, find the LINKS list near the bottom, and paste each SharePoint share link once. Buttons with no link show as “Link not set”.
04

How to revise this unit

Use your resources in this order. The Philosopher Companion is where you learn to plan both question types.

Watch the lesson & listen to the podcast

One podcast per sub-topic — a teacher and student talk each view through to a judgement. Annotate as you listen.

Complete the greyscale booklet

Read the given text, write the key claims in your own words, then decide the strength and weakness you'd give each view.

Match & apply the key terms

In the Companion: match each term to its meaning, then use it in a sentence. RAG-rate the mastery checklist with the three faces.

Plan AO1, then build AO2 on top

Use the Companion frameworks and the guidance-left / your-turn-right scaffolds. Never evaluate what you haven't first explained.

AO1 · Examine the views (10)
What it is — the factual chain: define authority, then set out each view in order and apply the evidence (e.g. Genesis).
Aim — explain the whole range accurately and neutrally. No judging yet.
AO2 · Evaluate the claim (15)
What it is — a three-paragraph dialectic: view, then evaluation → counter-evaluation → implication; mirror it; then judge.
Aim — weigh the views, use one as a lens on another, and reach a justified judgement that links back to your thesis.
05

Watch: the whole unit in one go

A full review of The Nature of God — monotheism, the attributes, the Trinity, the Son, personal language, the feminist critique and process theology. Best watched before you revise, then again to check recall.

Video not set

Teacher: paste the YouTube link in the VIDEO_URL line near the bottom of this file. The player then appears here automatically.

06

Flashcards — test yourself

Flip a card to check yourself. Switch between key terms (term → meaning) and views (view → claim, strength & weakness), and filter by sub-topic.

Tap any card to flip ·