A-Level Religious Studies · AQA Paper 2B Harlington School · Philosophy & Ethics

Secularism & the Church

One unit, one argument — told three times. Britain is more secular every decade: is that the defeat of Christianity, or the gospel changing where it lives?

The
big
question

Has secular Britain replaced Christianity — or absorbed it?

01

The secularisation spectrum

Every debate in this unit lines up on an axis — from Christianity replaced to Christianity relocated. Pick a sub-topic, then tap a position to see what it claims and where it's strong or weak.

Christianity replacedChristianity relocated

Tap a circle — or use Tab and Enter — to explore each position.

The thread that ties it together

Top answers don't treat the three debates separately. The same ideas run through all of them — spot the thread and you're writing at the top of the mark scheme.

Failure or success?

The same falling-attendance data reads two ways: Christianity losing its authority — or its values so absorbed that no label is needed.

The incarnation

If God became human in Jesus, the secular world is where the gospel belongs. That one doctrine licenses every engagement strategy.

The evidence question

Dawkins' charge — belief without evidence — echoes through every debate. So do its replies: the poetry analogy, and McGrath's limits of science.

02

The same question, three times

The unit splits into three debates. They look different, but each is really asking who gets the final word.

Sub-topic 1

The Challenge of Secularisation

Has religion been replaced?
ReplacementReason takes religion's chair — Feuerbach, Marx, Freud, humanism.
IndividualisationFaith privatised: Augsburg → Westphalia → consumer choice.
Militant atheismDawkins: religion is irrational and harmful.
Counter-caseValues absorbed — success, not defeat.
Sub-topic 2

Wealth, Materialism & Dawkins

Do the responses work?
MaterialismStatus = wealth; religion adds nothing.
Counter-witnessLuke 16 · monastics · Cadbury & Salt · tithing.
DawkinsThe God Delusion: belief without evidence.
McGrathThe Dawkins Delusion: science can't adjudicate on God.
Sub-topic 3

New Expressions & Social Relevance

Where should the Church stand?
Fresh ExpressionsBeing church within secular life (2004).
House ChurchRebuild the Early Church, apart (1960s).
LiberationistGutiérrez · Romero · Faith in the City.
QuietistSpiritual aid only — leave politics alone.
03

Your resources

🎯 Practice and intervention for this unit · the Arena warm-up, the same question answered at D, C, B and A*, the four moves of your tier, timed writing with Coach Owl

Everything for the unit, in one place. Open a sub-topic's lesson, booklet and podcast, and use the Philosopher Companion across all three.

Teacher setup: links aren't set yet. Open this file, find the LINKS list near the bottom, and paste each SharePoint share link once. Buttons with no link show as “Link not set”.
Sub-topic 1

The Challenge of Secularisation

▣Lesson deck↗ ✎Completion booklet↗ ♪Lesson podcast↗
Sub-topic 2

Wealth, Materialism & Dawkins

▣Lesson deck↗ ✎Completion booklet↗ ♪Lesson podcast↗
Sub-topic 3

New Expressions & Social Relevance

▣Lesson deck↗ ✎Completion booklet↗ ♪Lesson podcast↗
04

How to revise this unit

Use your resources in this order. The Philosopher Companion is where you learn to plan both question types.

Watch the lesson & listen to the podcast

One podcast per sub-topic — a teacher and student talk each view through to a judgement. Annotate as you listen.

Complete the greyscale booklet

Read the given text, write the key claims in your own words, then decide the strength and weakness you'd give each view.

Match & apply the key terms

In the Companion: match each term to its meaning, then use it in a sentence. RAG-rate the mastery checklist with the three faces.

Plan AO1, then build AO2 on top

Use the Companion frameworks and the guidance-left / your-turn-right scaffolds. Never evaluate what you haven't first explained.

AO1 · Examine the views (10)
What it is — the factual chain: define secularisation, then set out each position in order and apply the evidence (a thinker, a date, a British example).
Aim — explain the whole range accurately and neutrally. No judging yet.
AO2 · Evaluate the claim (15)
What it is — a three-paragraph dialectic: view, then evaluation → counter-evaluation → implication; mirror it; then judge.
Aim — weigh the views, use one as a lens on another, and reach a justified judgement that links back to your thesis.
05

Watch: the whole unit in one go

A full review of Secularism — the challenge, the responses on wealth and Dawkins, and the Church's new expressions. Best watched before you start revising, then again to check your recall.

Video not set

Teacher: paste the YouTube link in the VIDEO_URL line near the bottom of this file. The player then appears here automatically.

06

Flashcards — test yourself

Flip a card to check yourself. Switch between key terms (term → meaning) and views (view → claim, strength & weakness), and filter by sub-topic.

Tap any card to flip ·