A-Level Religious Studies · AQA Paper 1 Harlington School · Philosophy & Ethics

Free Will & Moral Responsibility

One argument, three moves: what responsibility requires, whether anyone ever has it, and what follows for reward and punishment.

The
big
question

Could you have done otherwise — and if not, can anyone fairly be praised, blamed, rewarded or punished?

01

The freedom spectrum

Every debate in this topic lines up on the same axis — from no freedom (and so no desert) to full freedom (and so full responsibility). Pick a sub-topic, then tap a position to see what it claims and where it is strong or weak.

Tap a circle — or use Tab and Enter — to explore each position.

The thread that ties it together

Top answers do not treat the three sub-topics separately. Three ideas run through all of them — spot the thread and you are writing at the top of the mark scheme.

Could I have done otherwise?

Determinist: no. Libertarian: yes. Compatibilist: yes, if I had desired to. One question, three answers — and everything follows from which you give.

The responsibility gradient

Blame is never on/off. Every excuse works by sliding a person along a line from fully responsible to not responsible at all.

Positions that undercut themselves

Determinism is itself a determined statement; Skinner's engineered society assumes we can act otherwise. Spotting self-refutation is the best AO2 move here.

02

One argument, three moves

The topic splits into three sub-topics. They look separate, but each one only makes sense because of the one before it.

Sub-topic 1

The conditions

What must be true before we blame?
Condition 1A free, conscious, voluntary act (Aristotle).
Condition 2Understanding right from wrong.
ExemptionsNot yet learned · cannot · permanently · temporarily forgotten.
SourcesInnate (Hume) · social (relativism) · religious.
Sub-topic 2

The extent

Does anyone ever meet them?
Hard determinismUniversal causation — freedom is an illusion.
Three formsScientific (Laplace) · psychological (Skinner) · theological.
LibertarianismWe are free moral agents; influences incline, not determine.
CompatibilismHume: freedom is doing what you desire.
Sub-topic 3

Reward & punishment

So what do we do with offenders?
Approach XCrime as a condition to treat — therapeutic reform.
Approach YCrime as a free act to punish — retribution, deterrence.
Kant'Ought implies can'; only retribution respects reason.
Just desertsVon Hirsch: the punishment must fit the crime.
03

Your resources

🎯 Practice and intervention for this unit · the Arena warm-up, the same question answered at D, C, B and A*, the four moves of your tier, timed writing with Coach Owl

Everything for the topic, in one place. Open a sub-topic's lesson, booklet and podcast, and use the Philosopher Companion across all three.

Teacher setup: links aren't set yet. Open this file, find the LINKS list near the bottom, and paste each SharePoint share link once. Buttons with no link show as “Link not set”.
04

How to revise this topic

Use your resources in this order. The Philosopher Companion is where you learn to plan both question types.

Watch the lesson & listen to the podcast

One podcast per sub-topic — a teacher and student talk each position through to a judgement. Annotate as you listen.

Complete the greyscale booklet

Read the given text, write the key claims in your own words, then decide the strength and weakness you would give each position.

Match & apply the key terms

In the Companion: match each term to its meaning, then use it in a sentence. RAG-rate the mastery checklist with the three faces.

Plan AO1, then build AO2 on top

Use the Companion frameworks and the guidance-left / your-turn-right scaffolds. Free will is examined in most sessions — plan the real past questions.

AO1 · Examine the positions (10)
What it is — the factual chain: set the problem, then each position in order, applying the evidence (Laplace, Skinner, Libet, Hume).
Aim — explain the whole range accurately and neutrally. No judging yet.
AO2 · Evaluate the claim (15)
What it is — a three-paragraph dialectic: position, then evaluation → counter-evaluation → implication; mirror it; then judge.
Aim — weigh the positions, use one as a lens on another, and reach a justified judgement that links back to your thesis.
05

Watch: the whole topic in one go

A full review of Free Will & Moral Responsibility — the conditions, the extent, and reward and punishment. Best watched before you start revising, then again to check your recall.

Video not set

Teacher: paste the YouTube link in the VIDEO_URL line near the bottom of this file. The player then appears here automatically.

06

Flashcards — test yourself

Flip a card to check yourself. Switch between key terms (term → meaning) and positions (position → claim, strength & weakness), and filter by sub-topic.

Tap any card to flip ·