A-Level Religious Studies · AQA Paper 1 (7062/1) Harlington School · Philosophy & Ethics

Conscience

One unit, one argument — told three times. Where does moral authority really come from: reason, society, the psyche — or God?

The
big
question

Should conscience always be obeyed — even when, in the end, it is wrong?

01

The authority spectrum

Every debate in this unit lines up on the same axis — from a source inside the individual (reason, intuition, God speaking within) to a source outside it (upbringing, society, conditioning). Pick a sub-topic, then tap a position to see what it claims and where it's strong or weak.

Left poleRight pole

Tap a circle — or use Tab and Enter — to explore each position.

The thread that ties it together

Top answers don't treat the three debates separately. Three ideas run through all of them — spot the thread and you're writing at the top of the mark scheme.

Inside or outside?

Every view sits somewhere between a source wholly INSIDE the individual (reason, intuition) and wholly OUTSIDE it (society, upbringing). The further outside, the weaker its claim to correct us.

The reformer problem

Durkheim and Freud struggle to explain the prophet, the abolitionist, the whistle-blower — a conscience that condemns the very group or upbringing that shaped it.

The need for an external check

Butler and Aquinas both say: follow conscience always, even in error. Applied to real cases, the unit asks whether something OUTSIDE conscience is needed to catch its worst mistakes.

02

The same question, three times

The unit splits into three debates. They look different, but each is really asking where conscience gets its authority, and whether that authority can be trusted.

Sub-topic 1

The Secular Conscience

Is it more than upbringing?
KohlbergReasoning developed through stages.
FreudThe super-ego — parents internalised.
DurkheimSociety's sanctions, felt from inside.
FrommAuthoritarian fear vs humanistic flourishing.
Sub-topic 2

The Religious Conscience

How directly does God speak?
Augustine & SchleiermacherConscience IS the voice of God.
AquinasGod-given reason — synderesis & conscientia.
ButlerGod-planted, but operates secularly.
FletcherNo conscience — only agape decides.
Sub-topic 3

Conscience Applied & Assessed

Does it actually guide us?
ReasonLying & adultery wrong — narrow excuses.
SocialWrong only while society disapproves.
PsychoQuiet wherever upbringing was quiet.
AgapeMrs Bergmeier — nothing wrong in itself.
03

Your resources

🎯 Practice and intervention for this unit · the Arena warm-up, the same question answered at D, C, B and A*, the four moves of your tier, timed writing with Coach Owl

Everything for the unit, in one place. Open a sub-topic's lesson, booklet and podcast, and use the Philosopher Companion across all three.

Teacher setup: links aren't set yet. Open this file, find the LINKS list near the bottom, and paste each SharePoint share link once. Buttons with no link show as "Link not set".
04

How to revise this unit

Use your resources in this order. The Philosopher Companion is where you learn to plan both question types.

Watch the lesson & listen to the podcast

One podcast per sub-topic — a teacher and student talk each view through to a judgement. Annotate as you listen.

Complete the greyscale booklet

Read the given text, write the key claims in your own words, then decide the strength and weakness you'd give each view.

Match & apply the key terms

In the Companion: match each term to its meaning, then use it in a sentence. RAG-rate the mastery checklist with the three faces.

Plan AO1, then build AO2 on top

Use the Companion frameworks and the real AQA questions in the Exam Questions organiser. Never evaluate what you haven't first explained.

AO1 · Examine the views (10)
What it is — the factual chain: name the accounts the question implies, then set out each in order — Kohlberg's stages, Freud's super-ego, Aquinas's synderesis, whichever the question names.
Aim — explain the whole range accurately and neutrally. No named scholars in the specification — teach the "representative cross-section," but don't name them in an exam answer's thesis as if the spec required it.
AO2 · Evaluate this claim (15)
What it is — a three-paragraph dialectic: view, then evaluation → counter-evaluation → implication; mirror it with a second view; then judge.
Aim — weigh the accounts, use one as a lens on another (does Aquinas survive Freud's challenge?), and reach a justified judgement that links back to your thesis.
05

Watch: the whole unit in one go

A full review of Conscience — the Secular, the Religious, and Conscience Applied & Assessed. Best watched before you start revising, then again to check your recall.

Video not set

Teacher: paste the YouTube link in the VIDEO_URL line near the bottom of this file. The player then appears here automatically.

06

Flashcards — test yourself

Flip a card to check yourself. Switch between key terms (term → meaning) and views (view → claim, strength & weakness), and filter by sub-topic.

Tap any card to flip ·